AC Milan v Inter and the tale of an iconic image
Champions League

AC Milan v Inter and the tale of an iconic image

By Staff Writer — 31 October 2026

An image of Inter defender Marco Materazzi leaning on the shoulder of Milan attacker Rui Costa has become one to symbolise the teams’ local rivalry.

A version of this article was first published in May 2023.

There was Rui Costa and there was Marco Materazzi. Beauty and the brawn. The elegant Portuguese shouldering the weight of his grizzled opponent’s elbow.

Tranquillity amid the chaos as a pair of footballing rivals paused to ponder a hazy wall of red smoke and simmering flares.

“Everyone was focused on the flares, on the smoke,” photographer Stefano Rellandini, who captured that iconic image 21 years ago, tells BBC Sport. “But near the centre of the pitch I saw a certain moment.

“Materazzi was nicknamed something like a butcher; he is not really a gentle player. Rui Costa was the opposite - more gentle, more artistic in his football. For several seconds Materazzi put his elbow on the shoulder of Rui Costa.

“So when I saw that, I shot it. I have just one frame in that sequence. That was the moment.”

The picture has its own legacy, but it also captured the end of AC Milan and Inter Milan’s 2005 Champions League quarter-final that was abandoned after flares and other objects rained down on the San Siro turf from a section of Inter fans, one striking and injuring Milan goalkeeper Dida.

With 73 minutes played of the second leg, the referee abandoned the match and the tie was later awarded to Milan, who were leading 3-0 on aggregate.

“The atmosphere that night was like every time you have an AC Milan and Inter derby at the San Siro,” says Rellandini, who was working for Reuters at the time.

“It is always strong. They don’t fight a lot, but the choreography of the supporters is huge and great, so you can really feel it, even if you’re not a player.

“When you put your feet on to the pitch, you can feel that it’s not just a soccer match. It is something more.

“You are really close to the players. It was a nice atmosphere; there was adrenaline.

“It just blew up when they disallowed the goal from Esteban Cambiasso. That completely changed the situation.

“The Inter Milan supporters were freaking out. They started throwing down objects, flares, and did not stop for about 15 or 20 minutes. It was something like a war.”

The tension had been brewing. Milan had knocked Inter out of the competition two years earlier on away goals, despite both semi-final legs ending in a draw at the San Siro. Milan went on to beat Juventus on penalties in the final at Old Trafford.

Milan also headed into the 2004-05 campaign as Italian champions - a sixth Scudetto since Inter last got their hands on the Serie A title in 1988-89.

Owner Silvio Berlusconi was building his second truly great Milan side and the entrepreneur-turned-politician had trusted Carlo Ancelotti, a member of the team that won successive European Cups in 1989 and 1990, to deliver another period of success as manager.

For the quarter-final second leg a formidable back four of Cafu, Jaap Stam, Alessandro Nesta and Paolo Maldini sat behind Andrea Pirlo, Clarence Seedorf, Massimo Ambrosini and Kaka, with Hernan Crespo - formerly of Inter - and Andriy Shevchenko up front. Rui Costa was on the bench.

Inter, meanwhile, had spent lavishly to try and compete with Milan and Juventus. Chairman Massimo Moratti broke the transfer world record twice in three years, first to sign Ronaldo from Barcelona in 1997 and then to get Christian Vieri from Lazio in 1999.

Crespo and Seedorf had arrived at Inter on big deals, but failed to land any significant silverware, before uniting across the divide at Milan.

Fabio Cannavaro had also come and gone - a misfiring two-year spell ending with a move to Juventus.

By 2005 the Inter midfield was built around the Argentina pair of Cambiasso and Juan Sebastian Veron, while ahead of them precocious Brazil forward Adriano was enjoying his most prolific season in a black and blue shirt.

The team was improving. The results weren’t.

Inter carried the unwanted tag of ‘August champions’ among rival fans, who mocked the expectations that had been built up in the summer transfer market and invariably fizzled out by the time silverware was at stake in May.

Among Inter supporters, there was an underlying feeling that they were running an unfair race - between them, Milan and Juventus had won 11 of the previous 13 titles.

However, in 2006 both would be implicated in the Calciopoli scandal. Juventus were relegated to Serie B for their part and stripped of two titles. Milan, Fiorentina, Lazio and Reggina were docked points.

In 2005 rumours were already swirling in the stands. Criminal investigations had begun in Naples and Turin over alleged bribery and corruption in football.

As the match turned against Inter, their fans’ frustrations - at the scoreline and their inability to close the gap on Milan and Juventus teams who always seemed one step ahead - spilled over from the stands and on to the pitch.

Stam and Shevchenko had given Milan a two-goal advantage in the first leg.

But heading into their ‘home’ leg at the San Siro, Inter’s fans were still buoyant and hopeful of a comeback.

Milan great Alessandro Costacurta, who came on as a substitute in the first leg, talked of the ‘Derby della Madonnina’ meetings as the “worst” days in his career.

He couldn’t sleep. “It was the turmoil of emotions,” he said. “It was the tension.” Team-mate Maldini described an “electricity” across the city.

Shevchenko also said he struggled to sleep and remembers seeing more club colours on show around the city as the games grew closer.

“There was great tension, great anticipation but above all passion, and always with civil attitudes,” the former Ukraine forward told Gazzetta dello Sport.

It was Shevchenko, Milan’s number seven, who opened the scoring half an hour into a fiery second leg when he beat Francesco Toldo with a left-footed effort from outside the box. That the forward had avoided punishment after appearing to headbutt Materazzi early on only added to Inter’s fury, with fans also believing they should have had a penalty.

But the real flashpoint came with just under 20 minutes remaining.

Inter midfielder Cambiasso’s bald head met Veron’s corner to seemingly make it 3-1 on aggregate, only for the goal to be disallowed because striker Julio Cruz was ruled to have fouled Dida. There looked to be little contact.

Flares thrown by the ultras in the Curva Nord began to pour down on the San Siro turf like flaming arrows.

One struck Dida on the shoulder, narrowly missing his head, as he attempted to clear the pyrotechnics and bottles from his penalty area.

The players gathered in the centre of the pitch as Maldini, Cambiasso and Inter captain Javier Zanetti remonstrated with referee Markus Merk, before Zanetti and Veron took to helping the firefighters who were dousing the flames by trying to clear debris from the goalmouth.

Eventually, with objects still cascading down from the stands, both teams were ordered off the pitch, attempting to shelter as they escaped via a tunnel in the same corner of the ground as the ultras.

“After the first few flares lit up, the pitch was completely in the fog, so you couldn’t see. Even if you wanted to catch a picture of someone injured, you couldn’t,” explains Rellandini, although he did manage to catch his masterpiece amid the chaos.

“They stopped the match for almost half an hour, which was strange at that time. You start to think that something bad has happened because they really threw down everything - they were getting crazy.”

When the players returned, Dida - treated for first-degree burns to his shoulder - was replaced by Christian Abbiati, but after 30 seconds, with the barrage continuing, Merk was forced to abandon the fixture.

“The referee took the right decision,” said Maldini. “I was surprised that he tried to restart the game but it was good because so many supporters had paid to watch.”

Ancelotti, like Inter manager Roberto Mancini, condemned the incident, calling it a “disgraceful episode”.

“What happened will not just discredit Inter but all of the city,” Ancelotti said. “The reaction of the Inter fans was completely unexpected. I was really surprised because I have never seen something like that in all of the Milan derbies that I have taken part in.”

Milan police chief Paolo Scarpi blamed it on “two to three hundred hooligans… the usual hotheads from the Inter section”, while Berlusconi, Italian prime minister at the time as well as Milan owner, suggested “drastic measures” were needed to stem the rise of violence at stadiums.

Uefa, European football’s governing body, handed Inter a £132,000 fine and ordered them to play four European games behind closed doors.

“This is the largest fine in Uefa’s history. There will be some people who think it is lenient and some people who think it harsh,” a Uefa spokesperson said.

Milan went on to beat PSV Eindhoven on away goals in the semi-finals - Dida set a Champions League record of seven successive clean sheets in their 2-0 first-leg victory, before PSV won the return 3-1.

Milan would have clinched a seventh European title but for a miracle in Istanbul - Liverpool scoring three times in six minutes in the final before winning on penalties.

Milan would get their revenge two years later, seeing off Liverpool in the final in Athens, although on a domestic level their points deduction and Juventus’ relegation opened the door for a period of Inter dominance in Serie A.

Inter were awarded the 2006 title then won four in a row, culminating in a Treble under Jose Mourinho in 2009-10.

Neither Milan side have won the competition since.

'We fell behind' - what does new San Siro deal mean for AC Milan and Inter?
Champions League

'We fell behind' - what does new San Siro deal mean for AC Milan and Inter?

By Staff Writer — 31 October 2026

When AC Milan and city rivals Inter jointly revealed the design of their planned new stadium on Thursday, one thing stood out in particular - the name.

The 71,500-seater arena the clubs aim to share from 2031 onwards, replacing the iconic San Siro, will be called the Generali Stadium.

Generali is an Italian insurance company, and the firm has agreed to pay about 650m euros (£542m) for naming rights through to 2052.

The length and value of the agreement makes it one of the most lucrative naming-rights deals in sports history.

Stadium naming rights are, of course, nothing new in elite football. The champions of England and Germany both play in arenas built in the 21st century that have always been known by their sponsors’ name, and plenty more stadiums across the continent have been partly financed by revenue from naming rights.

But in recent years, some clubs have struggled to sell them.

It was thought that both Tottenham Hotspur and West Ham would look to sell the rights to their new stadiums’ names, but as yet neither have. Liverpool aimed to sell the name of a new stand they built in 2016 but no such deal has been agreed.

So, what do these stadium plans mean for AC Milan and Inter, what underpins the viability of expensive new football grounds, and what impact do culture and history have?

AC Milan and Inter are owned by separate US-based investment firms and in the joint announcement described the Generali Stadium as “a new home for generations of supporters, and a destination designed to contribute to the cultural, economic and urban development of the city”.

The demolition of San Siro has been discussed for decades, and the clubs believe its deterioration and lack of modern features are significant reasons behind their progressive fall lower down the pecking order at the top of European football.

The new stadium is expected to cost about 1.2bn euros (£1bn) to construct, and the clubs aim to generate income by selling just under 12,000 of the seats as premium or hospitality, and host a wider array of events like concerts and fixtures in other sports.

“This is the biggest stadium naming-rights deal in the history of global sports,” AC Milan owner Gerry Cardinale told BBC Sport.

“That’s a significant achievement in its own right and especially in the context of having been done in Italy and what it means to bring Italy back to the world stage of football.

“But if you’re looking at this purely as an annual sponsorship payment, you’re missing the bigger picture.

“The stadium is what fundamentally transforms our economic model - matchday revenues, hospitality, premium experiences, entertainment and commercial opportunities.

“These are the things that allow us to compete with the biggest clubs in Europe.”

AC Milan have played at San Siro for 100 years, while Inter moved in 1947. The two clubs paid 197m euros (£164m) to buy the stadium and surrounding land in 2025.

The plans for the new stadium have faced opposition from some supporters, with some Inter fans protesting outside the venue where the plans were announced by carrying a banner reading ‘You will never extinguish the lights at San Siro’ and chanting “Hands off San Siro”.

“You cannot compete consistently with the best clubs in the world without having the infrastructure and economic model to support that ambition,” added Cardinale.

“The Premier League has set the benchmark in terms of commercial development and infrastructure. Italian football has fallen behind, and we need to change that.

“This stadium is a massive step forward, not just for AC Milan but potentially for the whole of Serie A.”

The two decades of naming rights paid for by Generali break down to about £27m per season - £13.5m per year, per club.

New stadiums are rarely built in Italy, with many Serie A stadiums in varying states of disrepair and in need of renovation before the country jointly hosts Euro 2032 with Turkey.

That means AC Milan and Inter have focused on selling a rare proposition.

“The 20-year deal is key - having that guaranteed long-term incomes gives the clubs security,” said Dan Plumley - sport finance expert at Loughborough University.

“The money stacks up pretty well. Spotify pay around 20m euros (£17m) to sponsor Barcelona’s Camp Nou per season, so now the Milan clubs aren’t too far off that figure.

“What a lot of these partners are looking for is a long-term relationship because they can build their profile as expand around the world, pushing themselves into regions like Asia and Africa, and football can be very valuable for that.

“It couldn’t be done at San Siro because everybody would have just carried on calling it that. Getting in early makes the sponsor part of the new history and is a really smart play from a business point of view.”

Historically, the home of stadium naming rights has been the US, where the majority of arenas in most sports are known by a sponsor name.

In European football, similar deals have been most common in Germany, where major companies have direct ownership links to some of the country’s biggest clubs including Bayer Leverkusen and Wolfsburg.

“It’s really difficult to do naming-rights deals in English football because of our history and culture,” said Plumley.

“The clubs and potential naming partners know that fans around the world could strongly oppose a deal, because it’s less common here, so the value becomes less attractive.”

Timing and performance on the pitch are key considerations when clubs are planning to sell the stadium name.

“As a club you don’t want to just do a cheap deal and give the name away for a few million just because it’s extra revenue,” said Plumley.

“Clubs like Spurs or West Ham know there is a trade-off between not just agreeing something because it’s a bit of extra value, having a deal that genuinely makes a difference financially, and doing something that the fans will tolerate.

“Sometimes the balance just isn’t right, and some of the most successful clubs in the world would rather hold on and protect their overall value and hold off and sell when their performance is at its peak - being in the Champions League is key to that.

“Everton weren’t in a position in terms of results to go out and get a big global name paying a huge amount every year, so a more local partner [the Hill Dickinson law firm] made sense.”

Fylde sign ex-Bamber Bridge midfielder Lang
Transfers

Fylde sign ex-Bamber Bridge midfielder Lang

By Staff Writer — 30 October 2026

AFC Fylde have signed midfielder Archie Lang on a two-year deal.

The 21-year-old joins, having left Bamber Bridge earlier this week, where he made a total of 15 appearances this season.

He could make his debut in Friday’s National League fixture against Hornchurch, the club said.

“It’s been a long time coming, but I’m really happy to be here, and I’m just ready to kick on now,” he said.

“I want to push myself, and this feels like the right place to do so.”

Halifax sign Houghton on loan from Blackburn
Transfers

Halifax sign Houghton on loan from Blackburn

By Staff Writer — 30 October 2026

FC Halifax Town have signed defender Lucas Houghton on a month-long loan deal from Championship side Blackburn Rovers.

The 19-year-old right-back made his debut for Rovers’ senior team in their 2-1 defeat by Sheffield United in the Carabao Cup in August.

He joins in time to be available for selection for the Shaymen’s home fixture against Yeovil Town on Saturday [12:30 GMT].

How talking about Man Utd's cycle of doom became an industry
Premier League

How talking about Man Utd's cycle of doom became an industry

By Staff Writer — 30 October 2026

Manchester United. More a high-volume content farm than a football club these days.

Michael Carrick’s starring role in what has become one of the nation’s favourite soap operas has been extended for at least another week, with the 45-year-old set to be in charge for Saturday’s visit to Chelsea.

Good news - you’d think - for Carrick. But even better news for Amazon’s All or Nothing camera crews, who have been given “unprecedented” access to document the behind-the-scenes goings-on at Old Trafford this season.

United fans will presumably be relieved when the football resumes on Saturday, if only to break up the constant stream of opinion for 90 minutes.

But while the wall-to-wall reporting of one of the world’s biggest football clubs is hardly new, the unrelenting coverage from former players is a growing phenomenon.

It is easier to name the Manchester United legends who don’t have a platform from which they scrutinise the club’s every move than those that do - and it begs the question whether the club’s demise has been industrialised into a content-creating machine.

Whether supporters feel comments from ex-players are damaging or not differs from fan to fan, but what cannot be denied is how difficult it is to escape their views.

Sky Sports pundit Gary Neville provided scathing on-air commentary during United’s 3-0 defeat by Bournemouth last Sunday, before conducting a post-match podcast in the Old Trafford gantry in which he accused some of their players of being unprofessional.

“There’s a couple of them… I live in Manchester and they’re not that professional, some of them,” Neville stated.

“I’ve got no time for them. There’s a few of them that don’t go to bed at the right time. Don’t eat the right things. Don’t think about Manchester United every single minute of every single day.”

But it’s digital and streaming platforms that are re-defining a new age of analysis.

Neville launched The Overlap in 2021, and its success across video and podcast platforms has seen the channel become one of the most influential outlets in sports media.

On Tuesday, Wayne Rooney appeared on Neville’s Manchester United-dedicated YouTube channel ‘Stick to United’ where he said Carrick’s players “need a firework up their a***”.

Neville has since hosted his own The Overlap show where he said managers sometimes need to be sacked “for their own good”, while ex-United captain Roy Keane said Carrick and his backroom staff are “lucky boys” to still be in jobs.

Neville acquired a network of YouTube channels from United influencer Mark Goldbridge last summer, which has significantly increased the channel’s coverage of the club.

Largely known for viral clips of his expletive-laden rants during streamed ‘watchalongs’ of their matches, Goldbridge’s YouTube channels had amassed more than 3.7million subscribers.

Goldbridge - whose real name is Brent di Cesare - now co-hosts the ‘Stick to United’ show with Rooney, the club’s record goalscorer.

But Neville, Rooney and Keane are far from the only ones setting the agenda.

Class of ‘92 pair Paul Scholes and Nicky Butt co-host their own podcast called ‘The Good, The Bad & The Football’.

Before last season’s Manchester derby at Old Trafford - Carrick’s first home game in charge - Butt said City striker Erling Haaland would “pick Lisandro Martinez up and run with him”, while Scholes said the Norway forward would “throw him in the net” after scoring.

United won the game 2-0, with Martinez putting in a stellar performance.

Asked about Scholes’ comments after the match, the Argentine defender said: “Honestly, he can say whatever he wants. I told him already, if he wants to say something to me, he can come to wherever he wants. To my house, wherever. I don’t care.”

Asked during Thursday’s news conference how he deals with the ‘noise’ from former team-mates and ex-players, Carrick said he avoids it as best he can.

“I don’t see it really. I see the things that I need to see,” he added.

“I don’t look for it - it doesn’t really help in any way.”

“I’ve said it before, I care about what the supporters think. I care about what it feels like in the stadium, and them travelling to games for us, to come and see us and support us. I care about what we give them, and what we offer them, and what they see. I genuinely don’t take any notice of anything else.”

Where once a low rating in a newspaper could anger players, they now have to deal with days of debate after a bad result or below-par performance.

Former manager Erik ten Hag recently alluded to the difficulty his Manchester United squad had dealing with the opinions of people like Neville and Rio Ferdinand, and said former players could be “more helpful” to the club.

“I did nice interviews with them both [Neville and Ferdinand], so it didn’t hurt me. Of course, they have podcasts, they have their models,” Ten Hag told The Athletic.

“Sometimes it’s difficult for players. Some of them get affected by it, get annoyed by it.”

“They achieved massive successes. But also, they can help the club more, help the players more. There should be two ways that they support it. But I think always the thing you most love, you most criticise.”

It is a point Neville agrees with.

Speaking on Ferdinand’s podcast last summer, it was put to Neville he had been overly critical when covering his boyhood club.

“It’s a balance though Rio, isn’t it?” he told his former United team-mate.

“It’s like, do I want [Manchester] City to win the league? I absolutely don’t want City anywhere near the league title.”

And he insisted “United are the hardest games I do”.

“People might think that I’m more critical of United when they don’t play well. Sometimes, over the last maybe 10 years, the balance, maybe I’ve not got it right,” admitted Neville.

But, having won 18 major honours in 19 years at Old Trafford, few are better placed to judge the club than Neville.

“There was a banner in the first half [against Bournemouth] that was held up in the Stretford End - ‘standards’. They went a long time ago,” he said last Sunday.

Like Neville, Butt also came through United’s academy and said former players have the club’s best interests at heart.

“When it goes bad, you can’t cry and go, ‘Oh, they’re [ex-players] having a go at us’,” explained Butt back in January.

“We love the football club. I’ve been a Manchester United fan since the age of six or seven, as long as I can remember. I’m not saying it to go, ‘Let’s stab everybody in the back’. I’m saying it because it is genuinely c**p.”

While the club would rather be awash with positivity, negative coverage is consumed by a wider base that more regularly includes non-Manchester United fans.

It’s difficult to apply a value to the club’s popularity but United have remained one of the highest-grossing football clubs in world football since last winning the Premier League in 2013.

Much of their off-field success has been underscored by industry-leading commercial deals, as well as strong matchday revenue. Only Arsenal made more money from matchday revenue last season in the Premier League.

Former executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward angered supporters in 2018 when he said: “Playing performance doesn’t really have a meaningful impact on what we can do on the commercial side of the business.”

Being a constant source of attention is something that the club and supporters have regularly boasted about, too.

The ‘hated, adored, never ignored’ mantra regularly appears on banners at Old Trafford, while the club even released a clothing range that adorned the slogan.

It’s fair to say, then, that the club are as guilty as anyone in capitalising on their global fame and ability to grab headlines.